You ignored the rest of the question. Do you oppose Christian expansion in non Christian areas like China?
He made a pass at you. I'd hardly equate that to the physical abuse Weinstein et al. subjected so many women to. Simply ignore or reject his advance, and move along. Like you said, you'll never see him again, and him engaging in infidelity behind his wife's back (presumably) is his sin, not yours. For all you know, he and his wife may have an open relationship...Not that I condone that, but it's the reality of modern times.
We know people lie and deceive for profit. We do not know that real magic or the supernatural exist. The most likely answer is it's all just a trick, but for some reason you go with the most unlikely answer of it being something that can't even be shown to actually exist. You are gullible.
Oh I know what extrapolation is, and it is not evolution as you've decided to go in that direction.
Isn't it all our wallets?
no Sir - my Bible came from God, our Creator.
There's times where religion is appropriate in schools. Like religious education courses where comparative religion education is taught.
Some atheists claim they don't believe in God because there is no empirical proof of His existence (there's also no empirical proof to date of the existence of extra-terrestrials but that doesn't tell us they don't exist anywhere in the universe). They are critical of those who believe in something without empirical proof. What some atheists don't seem to realize is that they are doing the very thing they criticize others of doing--believing in something that cannot be proven. They cannot empirically disprove God's existence, yet they believe He doesn't exist.
Or he snatched someones screen shots
Science doesn't 'play' by any rules. Science IS those rules. The rules apply to what we have found to be the best system for gathering accurate information about stuff. "Stuff" means things observable. For things to be observable they must have observable attributes. God is not within the order of 'stuff' as God doesn't have attributes. God is a belief based upon experience and appreciation of experience.
Prophecy is not scientific. For prophecy to be tested it need to be explicit, detailed and specific not open ended. Saying a tragedy is going to happen in the future is not prophecy. Evolution is science, it makes predictions that have been confirmed objectively. Please list any prophecy that gives dates, names, specific details that match history.
Of course the only type EVER considered in the US would be single payer.
It has its place.
Really? Brave, but I think teaching that all religions are fiction, with no basis or evidence to support them at all, might just trigger an enormous backlash from those who still believe in primitive superstitions. Might be more pragmatic to just avoid the topic in schools. That allows parents to raise their own children as they want without having others impose their religious beliefs on other people's children.