But yeah, those characters weren't of your cult. If anything, they were Jewish. Hebrew.
You must be reading the "new rebellious version" bible. Twisting truth Only convinces those who shut their eyes as you obviously do.
That's just the thing though - scholars already have gone on a scavenger hunt for the historical truth about Jesus. Finding truth takes investigation, and investigation is effort.
He isn't evidence of God. He's evidence his parents had sex.
"The Bible itself make very strong indications that it should be taken literally."
Damn...im sorry Yoru "hug"
Lets see, perhaps I don't view asking desperate poor people who believe in miracles to send money as a seed so that God can make miracles happen in their lives is "work".
That's where facts differ from interpretations. The "Jesus of History" is either fact or not. But scholars distinguish this from the "Christ of Faith" upon which Christianity rests. No one ever let themselves be martyred for the Jesus who was born, walked & breathed, & was crucified. But folks let themselves become lion-food for faith in who/what he was beyond his physical identity ("Christ", "God", etc).
Is fauxnews ever wrong? /s
This is what I see a lot on the dating scene. Middle aged men looking for hot women 20-30 years their junior.
Obviously my point was they're both perfectly legitimate under our system.
I kind of want to make a thread about this. It's interesting
Exactly - faith and religion . You know... atheism
I miss those Fishhand Kangapuses...