You mean lord of the underworld, yes? : )
Adults who have adult conversations don't put words in their conversation partner's mouth. They listen to each other, they engage each others' points, and if they misunderstand one another, they clarify their meaning by providing a definition. A paraphrase of a quote from a reference book is neither a definition of "form and structure," nor is it an example of a contemporary work of fiction. Moreover, your paraphrase does not support your original contention.
Nope. And neither were his rights violated like Khadr's were. You are comparing apples and oranges.
Because they are insecure nelly bigots.
Voters gave republicans the House in 2010 and the Senate in 2014 to STOP Obama policies not to pass them! The same thing happened to a greater degree in 1994 when Clinton tried to cram Hillarycare down our throats!
Just checked the stat sheets....
Feticide is abhorrent, reprehensible.
Just as to Brazil as presented in the graphic: Catholicism's losses are Pentecostalism's gains. Unlike the US, Pentecostalism is the major share of Protestantism in general in Brazil, and has for some years been making inroads into Catholicism. The None or No Religion population rose from 2000 to 2010, but not by much.
Thanks for the good riddance.
I miss waiting to watch Buffy The Vampire Slayer and X-Files.
Meghan is to Harry what Bacon is to Applecorped
I believe that this forum is over-policed by the nonreligious. They don't let me have my discussions about Islam yet they allow ridicule of Christianity.
And Liberals use those to shit on Conservatives. We do too.
It's up to you to decide, either supporting its spread by silent acceptance and backing the false "religion of peace" narrative, or opposing it.
you're claiming they ought to be. i'm claiming anything is fine. nobody has an obligation to tax them or not tax them.
Maybe after you're done smearing autistic people you can explain how it is that your personal, private definitions of "deism" and "omnipotence" and "empirical knowledge" should be the operating definitions in our "conversation". Because if you don't, you're simply arguing that your emotional attachment to the way you use words is extraordinarily important to you. Which is interesting, from a psychological perspective about why humans hold irrational beliefs, but it doesn't tell me much else about whether there is evidence for God. And as has been said before, the fallacy of equivocation is one children literally use in kindergarten, and has no place in serious conversations.
Yeah some people are just shy.
?With claims about the supernatural (be it God, Satan, or leprechauns), you have to consider that there is zero concrete evidence other than hearsay.?
So then if you standard is independent verification you can throw out all of antiquity since the Bible is one of the few antiquated documents with independent verification.