So, based on this, what's your answer?
Your statement was wrong to begin with. God did not drown babies.
Quoting the bible isn't proof. I could quote a book on Sasquatch but that doesn't mean that the furry dude is real.
Again, it's your personal interpretation of the bible. One quote of three short verses alone does not define Christianity as a whole. I bet we could find a handful of verses in the bible you don't follow, too.
Lookin like Tommy Pickles out here
What's an internet Rando? Does that have something to do with the word "random" by chance?
Thank you for your thoughts, Steve. I hadnt thought about the judgement day being a daily experience, but you could be right. I'll just have to ponder that thought for a bit.
" does Christianophobia exist? Should it be taken seriously? "
moved up to respond directly to Tim O"Keefe.
Nope. The very name Israel showed up in the Bronze age.
What facts show it is more likely than highly sophisticated systems randomly originating, and what makes you think there was any randomness at all. It was simple chemistry and amino acids naturally and chemically reacting to the changing chemical environment. That?s not random. That?s chemistry. It?s not divine or any other unseen magical force. It?s simple chemistry and the fact one or several reactions creates life among trillions of chemical reactions is not surprising given the fact the earth was a goldilocks planet.
A friend of mine had a husband who killed himself because she asked for a divorce. She said the act was the ultimate manipulation.
Nothing does. They can discriminate against you for being a swinger or not liking the cut of your jib.
Christianity does not require adherent suspension of reality or to abandon reason. If you had any experience looking at Christology you would find the exact opposite is true. Christian philosophers literally consider Christ the logos. You know what the logos is right? It is Greek for "The way of reason." Christ was killed for what he said. His followers were too. Their killers were the unreasonable ones. And by fulfilling your position as the anti-christian does, you are also being unreasonable. GO, LOOK IT UP. Quit spitting ad hominem at me. You are the loser here.
Let me know what you want to learn.
Fedeli is to the PC's as Butts is to the Liberals....and on top of that if someone needs to get some heat for not having a platform ready when the campaign started I would suggest you look at the hierarchy of the party.
come to Papa
100 somewhat recognizable names, but maybe 40 do most of the volume, I would guess.
Do you hold a person who is 74 the same as someone who is 16?